The Silent Spread: How a Common Sand Fly Is Unexpectedly Transmitting a Dangerous Disease in Brazil

The discovery of Leishmania infantum in Pintomyia fischeri challenges established understanding of visceral leishmaniasis transmission and calls for revised public health strategies.

Infectious Disease Vector Biology Public Health

The Unseen Threat: When the Usual Suspect Isn't the Culprit

In the intricate world of infectious diseases, sometimes the most significant discoveries come from noticing what's missing. For years, scientists battling visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil—a potentially fatal disease affecting humans and dogs—focused their attention on a single sand fly species: Lutzomyia longipalpis. This insect was considered the exclusive vector, responsible for transmitting the deadly Leishmania infantum parasite. But then came a puzzling observation: both canine and human cases began appearing in regions where Lu. longipalpis was completely absent.

Key Insight

The persistent spread of VL in areas without the primary vector Lutzomyia longipalpis suggested other sand flies were involved in transmission 2 .

This medical mystery set the stage for a remarkable scientific discovery that would change our understanding of how this dangerous disease spreads through Brazilian communities. Researchers turned their attention to an unexpected culprit: Pintomyia fischeri, a sand fly species previously not known to transmit visceral leishmaniasis 1 2 .

Understanding the Enemy: Visceral Leishmaniasis and Its Vectors

The Deadly Parasite

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), also known as kala-azar, is the most severe form of leishmaniasis, caused by the protozoan parasite Leishmania infantum. Unlike cutaneous forms that affect the skin, VL attacks internal organs including the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. If untreated, it's fatal in over 90% of cases within two years of infection 4 .

The disease manifests through prolonged fever, substantial weight loss, fatigue, anemia, and dramatic enlargement of the spleen and liver. In Brazil, VL remains a significant public health challenge, with the country accounting for 93.5% of all reported VL cases in Latin America 7 .

The Transmission Cycle
Infected Sand Fly Bite

Sand fly bites a dog or human, injecting infectious parasites

Parasite Multiplication

Parasites multiply inside the new host's cells

New Sand Fly Ingestion

Different sand fly bites the infected host and ingests parasites

Parasite Development

Parasites develop inside the sand fly's gut

Cycle Repeats

Infected sand fly bites another host, continuing transmission

Sand Fly Species in Brazil

Species Primary Role Geographical Distribution Infection Rate with L. infantum
Lutzomyia longipalpis Primary VL vector Widely distributed in endemic areas 9.8% (experimental infections) 2
Pintomyia fischeri Potential VL vector Greater São Paulo region 0.23-4.8% 1 2
Migonemyia migonei Potential VL vector Multiple regions Not found infected in studies 2
Nyssomyia neivai Potential VL vector Southern Brazil Recently detected with L. infantum

The Discovery: An Unexpected Vector Emerges

The first clues emerged from the western part of Greater São Paulo, particularly in municipalities like Embu das Artes. Here, dogs and humans were testing positive for VL, yet intensive entomological surveys failed to find Lu. longipalpis 2 . Instead, researchers consistently found high populations of Pintomyia fischeri—comprising up to 89.5% of all sand flies collected in some areas 1 .

This distribution pattern raised a critical question: Could Pi. fischeri be responsible for transmission in these regions? To answer this, scientists needed to apply rigorous vector incrimination criteria, requiring evidence that this species:

  • Was naturally infected with Leishmania infantum in the wild
  • Was capable of supporting the parasite's development
  • Had behaviors compatible with transmission (biting both dogs and humans)
  • Was geographically and temporally correlated with disease cases 2
Vector Incrimination

Previous laboratory studies had already demonstrated that Pi. fischeri was susceptible to experimental infection with L. infantum, with infection rates of 4.8%—lower than Lu. longipalpis (9.8%) but still significant 2 .

The species also displayed attractive behaviors to dogs and had a survival rate long enough to transmit parasites. But the critical missing piece was evidence of natural infection in wild-caught specimens.

Detective Work in the Field: The Crucial Experiment

Methodology: Tracking Nature's Footprints

To confirm natural infection, researchers designed a comprehensive field study in the Embu das Artes municipality, a known VL focus without Lu. longipalpis. The study employed:

Collection Period

Monthly sampling from November 2018 to October 2019

Trapping Methods

Shannon and CDC light traps placed strategically

Collection Times

6:00 PM to 9:00 PM, aligning with sand fly peak activity

Processing

Detailed dissection and molecular analysis of captured specimens 1

The team collected 951 sand flies representing 10 different species. As expected, Pi. fischeri dominated the catches, representing 89.5% of all specimens. From these, 426 female Pi. fischeri were carefully dissected to examine their midguts for parasite infection 1 .

The Breakthrough Finding and Statistical Analysis

Parasite Identification Process

During dissections, researchers made the critical discovery: one female Pi. fischeri was found harboring live promastigotes (the insect-stage form of Leishmania) in its midgut. To confirm the identity of these parasites, they:

  1. Isolated the parasites in culture medium
  2. Amplified a specific gene fragment (234 base pairs of the hsp70 gene)
  3. Used restriction enzyme analysis (Hae III) for precise identification
  4. Confirmed the parasites as Leishmania infantum 1

This represented the first definitive evidence of natural L. infantum infection in wild Pi. fischeri, with an infection rate of 0.23% in the dissected females.

Sand Fly Collection Data
Collection Metric Number Percentage
Total sand flies collected 951 100%
Male sand flies 457 48.1%
Female sand flies 494 51.9%
Pintomyia fischeri specimens 851 89.5%
Female Pi. fischeri dissected 426 -
Naturally infected Pi. fischeri 1 0.23%

Comparative Vector Capacity

Parameter Lutzomyia longipalpis Pintomyia fischeri Nyssomyia neivai
Natural infection rate Well-documented 2 0.23% 1 0.4%
Experimental infection rate 9.8% 2 4.8% 2 Not fully determined
Infective life expectancy (days) 2.4 2 1.68 2 Not specified
Attraction to dogs High Moderate 2 Evidence in Southern Brazil
Proportion in collections where dominant Varies by region Up to 89.5% 1 Up to 85.8%

The Scientist's Toolkit: Modern Methods for Tracking Hidden Threats

The discovery of Pi. fischeri as a potential VL vector was made possible through sophisticated research tools and methods:

CDC Light Traps

Specialized traps that use light and sometimes heat or carbon dioxide to attract and capture sand flies for monitoring populations.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

A molecular technique that amplifies specific DNA sequences, allowing researchers to identify minimal amounts of Leishmania genetic material in sand flies 1 .

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)

A method that uses specific enzymes to cut DNA at precise sequences, creating unique patterns that distinguish Leishmania species from each other 1 .

Culture Isolation

Growing parasites obtained from sand fly guts in specialized media, allowing researchers to obtain sufficient material for further analysis 1 .

Implications for Public Health: Rethinking Control Strategies

The confirmation that multiple sand fly species can transmit VL has profound implications for disease control in Brazil. Traditional VL surveillance and control programs have heavily focused on Lu. longipalpis, potentially missing significant transmission by other species.

As the study authors noted, Pi. fischeri displays several characteristics that make it an effective secondary vector: it's highly abundant in certain regions, susceptible to L. infantum infection, attracted to dog and human hosts, and has a survival rate sufficient to transmit parasites 2 .

This discovery helps explain why VL continues to spread into new territories despite control efforts targeting the primary vector. It also highlights the need for:

  • Broader entomological surveillance that monitors multiple sand fly species
  • Regional adaptation of control strategies based on local vector species
  • Enhanced research into the biology and behavior of secondary vectors
  • Development of novel control approaches that target multiple species simultaneously
Public Health Impact

One promising approach involves using synthetic versions of sand fly sex-aggregation pheromones in "lure-and-kill" strategies. These methods attract sand flies to insecticide-treated areas, potentially controlling multiple species regardless of their specific host preferences 6 .

Conclusion

The detection of Leishmania infantum in Pintomyia fischeri represents more than just the identification of another insect that can carry a dangerous parasite. It underscores a fundamental principle in disease ecology: transmission systems are often more complex than they initially appear. As research continues, each new discovery adds another piece to the complex puzzle of disease transmission, ultimately bringing us closer to more effective and sustainable control strategies for visceral leishmaniasis and other vector-borne threats.

References