The patient insisted they were crawling with insects, but the clinical evidence was nowhere to be found. This is the puzzling world of delusional parasitosis.
Imagine being tormented by the unshakable feeling that insects are crawling beneath your skin, yet doctor after doctor finds no medical evidence. This is the daily reality for individuals with delusional parasitosis, a rare psychiatric condition where patients firmly believe they are infested with parasites despite all evidence to the contrary.
What makes this condition particularly challenging is that these patients don't typically seek help from psychiatrists—they turn to dermatologists, convinced their problem is a skin condition. This creates a unique medical dilemma that blurs the lines between dermatology and psychiatry.
Delusional parasitosis, also known as delusional infestation or Ekbom syndrome, is classified as a psychotic disorder in the DSM-5, the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals 2 4 . Patients experience a fixed, false belief that they're infested with parasites, mites, worms, or other living organisms, often reporting sensations of crawling, biting, and stinging on and under their skin 7 .
Patients with delusional parasitosis typically present with a constellation of vivid symptoms. The most prominent feature is formication—the sensation of insects moving on or under the skin 2 . This is often accompanied by:
One of the most telling signs is what clinicians call the "matchbox sign" or "specimen sign"—patients carefully collect bits of skin, dust, fibers, or other debris in containers, bringing them as "proof" of their infestation 1 4 . In today's digital age, this has evolved into the "digital specimen sign," with patients presenting photos and videos as evidence 5 .
| Symptom Category | Specific Manifestations |
|---|---|
| Sensory | Crawling, biting, stinging sensations (formication) |
| Behavioral | Excessive cleaning, visiting multiple doctors |
| Physical | Excoriations, scars, skin damage from digging |
| Psychological | Anxiety, social isolation, depression |
The journey to diagnosing delusional parasitosis is one of exclusion. Dermatologists must first rule out genuine parasitic infections like scabies or other medical conditions that could explain the symptoms 4 6 .
This requires a thorough evaluation including comprehensive dermatological examination, laboratory tests, toxicological screening, and potential brain imaging in select cases 1 6 .
The most critical laboratory tests focus on identifying potential organic causes, with thyroid function tests, vitamin B12 levels, and toxicology screens being particularly important 6 .
A recent prospective study conducted over three years provides valuable insights into treatment approaches and outcomes for delusional parasitosis . The research followed 21 patients, documenting their clinical profiles and responses to various antipsychotic medications.
The study employed a prospective, observational design, enrolling patients who presented with dermatological manifestations ultimately diagnosed as delusional parasitosis . All participants underwent comprehensive interviews, mental status examinations, physical examinations, and regular follow-up assessments .
| Medication | Number of Patients | Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Risperidone | Not specified | Effective |
| Olanzapine | Not specified | Effective |
| Quetiapine | Not specified | Effective |
| Pimozide | Not specified | Effective |
| Overall combined treatment | 21 | 90.4% positive response |
Delusional parasitosis represents a fascinating intersection of dermatology and psychiatry, challenging the conventional boundaries of medical specialties.
While the disorder remains poorly understood, evidence confirms that antipsychotic medications are effective, with recent studies showing response rates exceeding 90% .
The condition underscores a critical lesson in medicine: physical symptoms can have psychological origins, and psychological distress can manifest in physical ways. For dermatologists, managing these patients requires a delicate balance of clinical skill, diplomatic communication, and sometimes, stepping beyond traditional dermatological boundaries.
As research continues to unravel the neurobiological mechanisms behind this puzzling condition—potentially involving dopamine dysregulation in the brain—there is hope for more targeted treatments 4 6 . What remains clear is that these patients, who often feel dismissed and isolated by the medical system, deserve compassionate, evidence-based care that addresses both their psychological suffering and physical symptoms.
For now, the question of whether dermatologists should treat this psychiatric disorder has a nuanced answer: they may not need to treat it alone, but they play an indispensable role in recognizing it, building the therapeutic alliance, and initiating the conversation about treatment—often the most difficult step of all.